Categorized | 2 Nests, Featured, Reviews

‘Where the Wild Things Are’ Review

where_the_wild_things_are_ver4

Although a lot of adults say they wish they could go back to being kids, most kids would say they can’t wait to get older. The Catch-22 of the circle of life. The grass is always greener wherever you aren’t, so adults look back fondly upon their childhood, while youngsters imagine an ability to do anything you could possibly dream of, as long as you were of age. Being a child is no picnic, though. It’s difficult to adhere to a parental figure’s whim and mood. As a non-authority figure, your voice is very rarely, if ever, heard, unless crying. Even then, the objective it determine how to shut you up. At the centerpiece of Where the Wild Things Are, Max experiences similar childhood difficulties.

Max is our nine-year-old hero. He’s an imaginative child maybe not by choice, but out of necessity. His father is no longer around, his mother works and he has a teenage older sister (is there any worse a combination?). Because of these circumstances, Max is left to his own devices and must imagine a world possible for him to inhabit. He builds an “igloo” out of a mound of snow and though playfully at first, gets involved in a snowball fight with his sister and her friends. Things quickly turn for the worse when he retreats to his igloo and one of his foes collapses the structure, scaring him. His sibling offers no help, so he marches up to her room, spreads the dirty frozen water around and trashes the one thing he had bothered to give her. That ought to teach her.

As a single parent, Max’s mother must work to support their family. The two seemingly have a strong relationship between them, as Max possesses the ability to cheer her up with a dance and a story. The quiet moments when he’s able to command attention is when he feels most in his comfort zone. Unfortunately for him and those around him, lives do not revolve around a nine-year-old and when Max’s mother has another man over for dinner, he takes offense to it and makes a scene. Try as his mother might, she’s unable to coax him down from his soapbox and he runs away in protest.

He runs into his own dreamland, occupied by larger-than-life creatures deemed “Wild Things.” Some take the form of enlarged animals, others a purely imagined creation. Upon arrival, Max declares himself their king and they are open to a ruler after living a seemingly aimless existence and unstructured life which knows no borders. Amongst the Wild Things, he is the authority figure they look up to for discipline and Max may figure out being the sole voice of reason isn’t as easy as it seems.

You're never too young to get a sweater from Grandma for Christmas.

You're never too young to get a sweater from Grandma for Christmas.

Adapting the film from the beloved children’s book could not have been an easy feat, story-wise. The book contains little in terms of plot description, giving only the slightest framework to writers Dave Eggers & Spike Jonze. Instead, the visual adaptation of author Maurice Sendak’s gorgeous illustrations is what makes the film feel familiar to fans of the source material. The actualized Wild Things are a sight to behold, brought to life via a combination of puppetry and CGI facial moments. They are exact physical replicas of Sendak’s characters, able to send chills through the spines of any child who dared dream what Max’s imaginary friends would look like in real life. It’s a truly beautiful look.

The film was originally slated for release about a year previous, but was delayed due to a string of floating rumors. One of them was the studio thought the film was too dark to be a children’s movie and they wanted the tone lightened up. If this new version is “lighter,” they had every right to be concerned. By no means is this a children’s film. If anybody insists that it is, it’s the Leaving Las Vegas of children’s films. Aside from the first few minutes, the movie is largely unsettling and deals with depressed states and unhappiness. The two main Wild Things, Carol (male) and K.W. (female), have had some sort of unexplained past together. They appear to represent warring parents, forever wallowing in unhappiness. There is little to no redeeming value in Max’s trip to their island, aside from perhaps showing even imaginary life is no better than reality.

Another rumor from the one-year delay in release is supposedly the studio wanted Max to be recast. That’s a move that would’ve been absolutely wrong. Aside from the visually realized Wild Things, Max Records is the saving grace of the film. Max couldn’t possibly have been portrayed by anybody else, as Records is the boy in the wolf suit from the illustrated book. Though the story can be confounding in its message and outright dull at times, Records manages to be rambunctiously perfect. The character can certainly be viewed as a bit of a jerk, but Records has the ability to carry the viewer through, by his side.

It’s impossible to discount the creative effort attempted by Spike Jonze and his collaborators, as within the first five minutes I couldn’t help but think to myself, “what if all children’s films carried this wealth of ingenuity?” The film may be visually spectacular with a strong lead performance, but is almost excruciating to sit through. It left me in a daze, knowing but one thing, I didn’t love it. The rest of the area had to settle down a bit, like my mind had just endured a dirt clod fight. Where the Wild Things Are is a spectacular attempt at innovation, but falls far from the mark it set for itself. Perhaps more authority would have been a good thing.

tfnratelogo2pnteddone

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

8 Responses to “‘Where the Wild Things Are’ Review”

  1. ChaseKahn says:

    This would be the second movie in two weeks that I would have given 4 Nests to, and it came completely out of nowhere for me. I think this is Spike Jonze's best film — it surpasses everything that's come before it about childhood and growing up because it speaks the truth: that children are often hopelessly selfish, unconsiously cruel and emotionally confused.

    Sure the trip to the imaginary island has its payoff. It allows Max to see the fundamentals of human emotion from a different perspective in a way that's more relatable to him. It's not about solving his problems, it's about understanding them. Instead of a celebration of youthful innocence, it's a bleak, scathing look at it's troubles, and I absolutely love the film for that.

  2. The Rake says:

    I would largely echo Chase's comments. I was wowed by this film, in awe of its beauty. It is a wildly imaginative film that moved me. A special treat. Jonze has made a poetic pic that serves the kid inside the adult. A great score / soundtrack to boot. Perhaps the year's best.

  3. JoeCoconut says:

    This movie was amazing, I would easily give it 3 1 /2. Certainly one of the best of the year. I was delightfully surprised.

  4. Sarah says:

    I'm gonna have to go ahead and support Prodigal Son's take on the movie. Though visually stunning and a invaluable homage to a childhood classic, the storytelling completely fell flat for me. I remember being delightfully lost in the book as a kid, but I sadly stayed firmly in my seat in the Burbank AMC movie theater. There was no character to truly root for, no one to universally connect with–it was heart-wrenching but in a way that was full of conflict and awkwardness. I found the "wildness" of the wild place disturbingly violent that made me more uncomfortable that craving the wildness of childhood. Don't get me wrong–I understood the sentiment (I remember running so fast I thought my legs would fall off and screaming bloody murder at the top of my lungs when I was in 2nd grade just like everyone) but the tree smashing and dirt-clodding seemed way too malicious to be enjoyable to watch.

    Overall, the movie made me feel like I was watching mom and dad fight. If mom and dad were big, hairy, wild monsters, course. I was disappointed at the very least–I was so looking forward to it.

    • ChaseKahn says:

      "Overall, the movie made me feel like I was watching mom and dad fight. If mom and dad were big, hairy, wild monsters, course. I was disappointed at the very least–I was so looking forward to it. "

      To each his [her] own, but that's pretty much the point of the film. You could look at the wild things as an interpretation of Max's own parents, with Carol as the elusive father figure.

      "no one to universally connect with"

      I thought it was incredibly resonant for the way it depicted the complexity and confounding nature of childhood emotions. I remember being a kid and going through the same emotional tantrums, issues and feelings without ever knowing why.

      There's also the scene where KW brings her new "friends" to the fort and Max and Carol can't understand them, literally. How many people HAVEN'T felt upstaged or relegated to old news by a new third-party only to not understand what everyone sees in them. I know I have.

  5. RagingRob says:

    I need to see this soon Can't wait

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. [...] is Spike Jonze short film We Were Once A Fairytale, starring Kanye West. The Where The Wild Things Are (a movie that 3 out of 4 (so far) The Film Nest critics loved) director debuted the movie at the LA [...]


Leave a Reply

Box Office Results (Last Weekend)

# Title Weekend Gross Total Gross Week #
1 Takers $20.5 m $20.5 m 1
2 Last Exorcism $20.3 m $20.3 m 1
3 The Expendables $9.5 m $82.0 m 3
4 Eat Pray Love $6.8 m $60.5 m 3
5 The Other Guys $6.2 m $99.0 m 4
6 Vampires Suck $5.2 m $27.8 m 2
7 Inception $4.8 m $270.5 m 7
8 Nanny McPhee Returns $4.7 m $16.9 m 2
9 The Switch $4.5 m $16.4 m 2
10 Piranha 3D $4.3 m $18.2 m 2
Big 10 Data: Courtesy of Box Office Mojo